It's not laziness it's the math
A single piece of "effortless-looking" content usually involves choosing an outfit, finding the light, taking 50 to 200 photos, picking the one that works, editing it, writing a caption, and timing the post. Multiply that by however many times a week you're expected to show up, and the actual time cost is enormous, even when the result looks like it took thirty seconds.
The pressure to look spontaneous is exhausting
There's a specific kind of tiring that comes from making something look effortless when it absolutely was not effortless. The aesthetic you're going for golden hour, no-makeup-makeup, looks-like-I-just-woke-up-like-this usually requires more planning than a posed studio shot, not less. That gap between how it looks and how much it actually took is where a lot of the exhaustion lives.
What doesn't help
Posting less is the advice everyone gives and almost nobody can actually follow, because the algorithm rewards consistency and most creators know it. Buying more presets or filters doesn't help either it speeds up editing a photo you already have, not the much bigger time cost of getting a usable photo in the first place.
What actually helps
The real fix is reducing the number of steps between "I have an idea for content" and "this is posted," not reducing how much you post. Tools that remove the photoshoot entirely a few taps to get an editorial-quality image instead of an hour of setup, shooting, and editing address the actual bottleneck. The goal isn't to care less about how your content looks. It's to stop needing two hours to make it look that way.